American NonFiction Literary Online Magazine

Background Noise

Bold Rewrite Cover.
As much as I sympathize with the desire to live a better life, it isn’t right to do so fraudulently, and granting amnesty would be the same as rewarding fraud. We should not favor people who could not bother themselves to fill out some forms and wait, over those who have played by the rules.

Posted - Saturday, May 22nd, 2010

Edited - Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

An(other) Open Letter to President Obama

At first, I thought to offer a strict prisoner’s dilemma scenario to the President. I decided that would not go over quite as well. I’d love to know if anyone finds anything immoral, unethical, inhumane, cruel, or unjust about this. It’s a pragmatic solution that doesn’t actually harm anyone. Families would not be ripped apart–they’d be paid to stay together, in fact. I don’t like the idea of forking over money to lawbreakers, but hell, it would save so much money you wouldn’t believe it.

Of course, it’s just as likely that someone will scream “racist!” and compare this (and yours truly) to Hitler. Oh, sweet irony. I hope the White House sends me a reply. I’d love that.

Your Name
Your Address
Your Phone Number

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
(202) 456-1414

Dear Mr. President,

Thank you for your hard work. As an independent voter, I respectfully disagree with many of your policies, but I disagree with the Republicans just as much. I know you have a tough job and keep long hours.

I would like to offer an equitable solution to the immigration debate currently ongoing in Washington. I am a strong proponent of legal immigration: diversity makes us stronger as a nation. At the same time, I believe the illegal immigration issue needs to be dealt with in a manner that is humane, and yet good for American citizens first and foremost.

As much as I sympathize with the desire to live a better life, it isn’t right to do so fraudulently, and granting amnesty would be the same as rewarding fraud. We should not favor people who could not bother themselves to fill out some forms and wait over those who have played by the rules.

Rather than complain about the problem, though, I offer a solution that is fair and equitable:

We should pay undocumented workers to leave. Offer a $3000 reward to every undocumented worker who turns himself/herself and his/her family in to the INS (add $250 per head, plus tickets home). We could pay the undocumented to turn in others to the INS. This program would offer $1500 and a bus ticket home for every undocumented worker referred to the INS by another UW.

With 12 million UWs, we’d need–at most–100 billion dollars (18-36 billion in rewards, plus tickets and administrative costs.) The healthcare and welfare savings would pay for the program in months. To prevent this from being a sensitive issue, we would disallow citizens and lawful residents from participating. Perhaps create a short-list of workers who turned themselves in, and offer to allow them special probationary reentry after completing the requisite paperwork—outside of the country, of course.

This would give the workers the opportunity for a fresh start in their home countries, or the opportunity to return, but lawfully. Stiff penalties and improved border patrols would discourage unlawful reentry.

The undocumented workers would be treated humanely and leave better off than they arrived, and full cooperation would allow for easier access to lawful work visas. In the meantime, this would free up jobs for millions of Americans, and it would save billions of dollars for taxpayers in healthcare and welfare costs.

Thank you, and God bless,

Ian McLeod

Tags: , ,

3 Comments

  1. Wesley A. Bridle added these pithy words on May 22, 2010 | Permalink

    While I agree illegal immigration is a problem. I think the pay out would be a huge failure as after being sent home, they would sneak back.

    I feel we need more openness in the immigration process and work visa programs. We should openly let anyone into the country, while also retaining tight control over our boarder.

    If we allow all people into the country and allow them to freely work, we will divide the workers from the criminal element.

    This will cause an initial inflation but the aftermath would stem the flow of immigration. And with on the books workers, states earn more revenue in taxes.

    Though I also prose we should keep the taxes of all foreign workers.

  2. Atrian added these pithy words on May 22, 2010 | Permalink

    Japan did this, except they made them sign agreements to never set foot in Japan again. From what I have read, it worked.

    The primary difference is that Japan does not share a border with any other country via land.

  3. Ian McLeod added these pithy words on May 22, 2010 | Permalink

    That’s the thing. The U.S. government has the technology to seal off the entire border. The CIA satellites can spot a butterfly crossing the border. The government just doesn’t have the will to do what is necessary, because it isn’t politically expedient. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are exploiting illegal immigrants–the only reason they’re being let in is because their corporate cronies want cheap labor. Big Agriculture is a powerful lobby.

    I agree we should let foreigners work in country, but we have to do so in an orderly manner–and the well-being of American citizens must be given priority. Any country that grants favoritism to foreigners above its own populace is not long for this world. But you bring up an interesting point: the current legal immigration system is as broken as the border itself, and needs to be overhauled. How we do that is not my concern at the moment, but it can be streamlined (perhaps use of the internet would help.)

    That said, the 12 million “undocumented workers” who are currently here have broken the law, and to grant them amnesty would be a disgrace. They should be sent home, and then allowed back–only after completing the paperwork. Some will stay home–having a few grand will encourage that, as a person can live quite well off 3k in Mexico, others will play by the rules, and still others would encounter a beefed-up border patrol.

    In my plan (should President Obama ask for more information, hah), when they turn themselves in, they will be documented, fingerprinted, photographed. If they should come back (especially to try to double-dip), they will be apprehended more readily and sent home more rapidly.

    My plan would surely fail if we don’t secure the border. One way is to make it clear that catch-and-release is over.

    Hell, Blackwater (Xe) may be unpopular, but we cut them in on the border patrol gig? No one will want to come within fifty miles of the U.S. border.

    Getting rid of the illegals has the potential to cut unemployment among citizens and legal residents in half. Now that the economy sucks, I know people who really want those “jobs Americans won’t do.”

POST A COMMENT

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Under

Construction

Social Issues Blog Directory